Sie sind vermutlich noch nicht im Forum angemeldet - Klicken Sie hier um sich kostenlos anzumelden  
Sie können sich hier anmelden
Dieses Board hat 2.096 Mitglieder
19.688 Beiträge & 19.285 Themen
Beiträge der letzten Tage
Anzeige
 have downed tools.Yet courses of action based on logical analysis of narrow premises have a nasty hab - Eine neue Antwort erstellen Ihre Schreibrechte
Benutzername:
 
Betreff
 

Beitrag:
Grafische Sicherheitsüberprüfung
Um automatische Antworten und Spam zu verhindern, übertragen Sie bitte die Zeichen in das Eingabefeld.

Im Beitrag anzeigen:

 In Antwort aufDiesen Beitrag zitieren
 have downed tools.Yet courses of action based on logical analysis of narrow premises have a nasty hab

The observation that cricket is a mad game will be one that many, both inside and outside the ranks of its followers, will instantly agree with. It demands a strange love. For a few hours during the final afternoon of the County Championship, however, the game that Middlesex and Yorkshire were engaged in threatened to be not merely mad but MAD.That is to say, had collaboration between the warring parties not been undertaken, they were heading for the cricketing version of Mutually Assured Destruction. As Middlesex batted on, unable to manoeuvre into a winning position, Yorkshire found themselves in a no more enviable situation. Had either team struck what threatened to be a decisive blow, their counterparts would likely still have been able to prevent them winning - a draw equating, in the circumstances, to complete failure, since this would have ensured the Championship title headed to the third party of Somerset.The analogy only works partially: MAD as a strategy was designed to leave both parties in perpetual stalemate - in the circumstances, a draw being as good as a win.By contrast, in the Lords scenario, a draw was the same as a loss, hence the need to step off the MAD treadmill.Which is why the two captains, James Franklin and Andrew Gale, famously negotiated in the War Room - the Pavilion toilets in their case - a specified target of 240 in 40 overs for Yorkshire.The equilibrium of the situation, with both teams locked in a deadly embrace, meant that such cooperation - and the binge of artificial run-gorging it entailed - was needed to yield a possibility of either succeeding. It was unfortunate that it had the side-effect of drastically reducing Somersets chances of the title, but that was one that neither Middlesex nor Yorkshire could reasonably have been expected to factor in, without compromising the integrity of the competition. As an arrangement, it was less contrivance, more concert. The unease of many viewers - and it should be acknowledged that it was to be found both among neutrals and partisans, cricket lovers and neophytes - can likely be ascribed to the fundamental expectation that one has when viewing sport, the unwritten contract between spectator and sportsmen: the latter are expected to exert themselves fully, to give no quarter, to expend the maximum effort in the attempt to win. Seeing joke bowling and fielding barely worthy of the term understandably stirred such discontent. It felt un-sporting, if not unsporting.When viewed in context, though, it was clear that what may have appeared preverted behaviour was a reflection of full exertion in the cause of winning, rather than the lack of interest that first glance might have suggested.Yorkshire had, of course, far from given up. Indeed, Gale could have justifiably employed General Oliver P Smiths famous pronouncement: We are not retreating - we are advancing in another direction. By Yorkshires conceding territory - runs - to Middlesex, both teams advanced in the game, reducing the probability of what could, for once, be properly termed a losing draw.The fuse was lit and the stage set for drama. Quite appropriately, too, for how could a great cricket finale be such without a dash of controversy?Earlier in the season, on the same ground, a situation had briefly threatened to arise where both teams would have stood to gain by not continuing to play. In the final round of the Royal London One-Day Cup, Middlesex played Surrey, with neither team assured of a place in the knockouts. On a day greatly affected by weather, a win would have given either team a strong chance of qualifying; however, if Kent and Hampshire lost their games, both Middlesex and Surrey would have qualified in the event of curtailment; the former on points, the latter on net run rate. Playing to a result, however, would mean one of them would likely be eliminated. Collaboration in such a situation would have benefited both teams, but at the cost of entertaining the spectators.It is mildly diverting to wonder whether, if it were beneficial for both teams competition prospects, those in the stands would ever call for players to halt the match. It would be another temporary inversion of the normal roles of sports viewing: the supporters would be ceding ground - their right to expect their team to attempt to win - to increase the chances of advancement at a later date. Partisans on both sides might be content with such an arrangement; neutral spectators likely less so.As it turned out, Kent won, ensuring that the Middlesex and Surrey captains, Franklin and Gareth Batty, did not need to grapple with such questions, and also that their teams obligations to the public - to provide a contest for them to observe - were fulfilled. One could argue that, logically, had that situation arisen, they should have downed tools.Yet courses of action based on logical analysis of narrow premises have a nasty habit of coming back to bite the subject. The most famous occurrence was the 1979 one-over declaration by Somerset that should, in theory, have sent them through to the quarter-finals, but actually secured their expulsion from the competition. Bizarrely, they even voted for their own disqualification. Again, the main ones to suffer were those least culpable: the spectators who saw 17 deliveries in the entire match.The exact opposite proved true in the Yorkshire game. Indeed, continuing to play without taking steps to guarantee a result would have reduced the spectacle for the crowd. Cricketers are blasted when they fail to provide sufficient entertainment to the paying viewers, so it hardly seems fair to then criticise them for taking actions that guarantee greater thrills. Collaboration may be a dirty word in battle, but when it promotes competition, theres no reason to get mad. Walter Payton Womens Jersey . The Lightning are 2-0 so far on a four-game road trip, giving the club five straight wins as the guest and improving Tampas away record this season to 11-8-2. Riley Ridley Bears Jersey . -- The St. Johns IceCaps weathered a wild first period with the help of goaltender Jussi Olkinuora, before finding offensive inroads in the second. http://www.chicagobearfootballauthentic.com/authentic-devin-hester-bears-jersey/ . The (11-11-4) Jets are seventh in the Central Division with 26 points. Fifth place Dallas and sixth-seeded Nashville also have 26 points, but the Stars have three games in hand on Winnipeg while Nashville has two. David Montgomery Womens Jersey . Louis Rams wide receiver Stedman Bailey last Sunday. The fine is the fourth this season for Goldson. He was fined $30,000 for a hit on the New York Jets Jeff Cumberland in Week 1. Brian Urlacher Jersey . Mats Zuccarello and Derek Stepan scored shootout goals, and backup goalie Cam Talbot earned his second win in two nights as the Rangers shook off a late tying tally and beat the Maple Leafs 2-1 Monday night. SALT LAKE CITY -- Eric Mika scored 20 points, L.J. Rose added 18 -- combining for 28 points in the second half -- and BYU turned back in-state rival Utah State 77-63 at a neutral site on Wednesday night.The Cougars (5-2) won their 11th straight at Vivint Smart Home Arena, where they have played at least once a year since 2007. It was their third straight win over the Aggies at the Arena and fifth-straight in the series.BYU led 37-31 at halftime and prevailed by hitting 21 of 25 free throws despite shooting 30 percent (8 of 27) from the ffield in the second half.ddddddddddddRose scored 16 of his points in the second half, making all three of his shots, including two 3-pointers, and 8 of 9 free throws.Yoeli Childs had 12 rebounds to go with nine points as BYU had a 55-31 advantage on the boards. The Cougars 23 offensive rebounds are the fifth most in school history.Jalen Moore had 15 points for Utah State (3-3), which was 6 of 11 from the line. ' ' '



jj009, 25.07.2019 07:48
Anzeige
Xobor Erstelle ein eigenes Forum mit Xobor
Datenschutz